Russia Defense Report – Jan. 22, 2016: Robot Wars



Donation alerts:


Or via: or via:,

BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ,

BCH ABC: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq,

ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9

Text by J.Hawk

One of the more visible signs of the technological revolution sweeping the Russian Armed Forces is the proliferation of battlefield robots being tested for use with the Ground Forces. The range of programs suggests this is a high priority for the Russian Ministry of Defense, and the existence of such weapons systems is indicative of the importance being placed on implementing the digital revolution in the armed forces to make them capable of waging net-centric warfare relying on small units operating independently, without a well defined frontline.

The most important robotic system under development for the Ground Forces is the 6-ton class Uran family of tracked vehicles, which include the Uran-6 minesweeping vehicle and the Uran-9 combat vehicle whose armament includes a 30mm 2A72 automatic cannon, Ataka laser-guided anti-tank missiles, and Igla or Verba short-range anti-aircraft missiles, which collectively allow it to engage all battlefield targets.

Russian industry also smaller vehicles under development, such as the Nerekhta and Platforma-M systems whose modular design allows them to be armed with machine-guns, automatic grenade launchers, anti-tank guided missiles, and RPGs.

There is even a miniature, backpack-portable assault-rifle armed battle robot named Strelok that is capable of climbing stairs and miniature quadrocopter drones armed with grenade and flame launchers.

The most ambitious initiatives include a robotic version of the BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle named Udar, and the remote control feature built into the Armata family T-14 tanks which enables individual T-14s to be controlled by other T-14s through the provision of high-volume datalinks which give complete access to the sensors, weapons, and controls of the vehicle being controlled. Instead of relying on satellite communications which combines long range with vulnerability to jamming and hacking, Russian battlefield robots are controlled using short-range communications of no more than a few kilometers in range.

The above-named and other systems are in advanced stages of development and troop testing. There are reports that some of the robotic weapons platforms were deployed for battlefield testing in Syria. While the reports of them spearheading assaults on jihadi positions in Syria while under control by Moscow-based operators are likely exaggerated.

Battlefield robots are being developed to perform two kinds of missions. The comparatively small size of modern armies means that stable frontlines will be rare in future warfare. Even the small in size Donbass theater of operations has a frontline consisting of checkpoints, fortified positions, and garrisoned towns, rather than continuous trenchlines, which presents both sides with opportunities for infiltration. It means that every unit has to worry about providing its own security and protection, both when occupying permanent positions and on the march, and the robots can provide that capability by performing surveillance and patrolling roads to discover ambushes and roadside mines.

The other mission is overcoming prepared defenses, including in urban terrain. The lethality of modern weapons means that offensive operations against opposing units in strongpoints or urban terrain are likely to suffer many casualties. While such resistance can be reduced through massed artillery or aerial bombardments, such tactics also cause unacceptable losses to civilian population and damage to infrastructure. Armed battlefield robots can perform armed reconnaissance by compelling defending units to reveal their positions by prematurely opening fire, clearing minefields and obstacles, and destroying individual strongpoints.

The development of a modern armor force, deployment of the Ratnik individual soldier suite, and the work on battlefield robots are aimed at ensuring the Russian ground forces can prevail not only in mobile armored warfare but also in the positional slugfests that have characterized the recent armed conflicts around the world.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yep, fellow Russians, there’s no other way to protect your wonderful. fatherland from the greed of Western barbarians. Particularly, if you take into account comparatively small size of Russian population. Only riding on the top of the technological achievements can make Russians sleep in peace. Thus constant monitoring and improvement of the educational system of Russia is of the essence.

F Gerard Lelieveld

We are surprised and ask “Were teachers’ salaries higher before?” Experienced teachers reply, “Meat used to be more expensive.” Teachers used to keep farm animals and had enough money, as they say, to buy Zhiguli cars with the money earned from selling meat.


Market oriented economy at its best. As far as I know, Pentagon is still the greatest purchaser of Russian RD 180 rocket engines. So good teachers breed cockerels yet better teachers assemble RD 180 engines. Both ride Zhigulis. Westerners are not barbarians – they are ‘primitive’ barbarians.

F Gerard Lelieveld

NASA you mean, that is NASA uses Russian space launch facilities. ;-)


Yep. To spy Russians?! Mad world!
Well, I must withdraw my statement as for ‘primitive barbarians’ and give you my apology for being rude. You deserved it.

F Gerard Lelieveld

Thank you! I am Dutch and collect vodka.
Americans oursource their vodka making to Holland.
Most tasteless vodka in the world: Vox, for mixing cocktails.


I like the hate for western pigs but don’t wake the sleeping giant now fellas. we are on the brink of civil war but don’t give us a reason to unite. not a threat, I want you to win, but we got some badass killers over here. those military guys are usually the dim wits. even our ufc guys are not our best. that is shit money they make by American standards. fedor rules though. viva la kremlin