Zelenskiy Arrived In Donbass Amid Growing Military Escalation

Russia will take out all the HQs in Ukropisstan before that happens.
It will make Desert Storm look like a walk in the park.

Is that the one where the US Patriot missile took down one of the US jets, in error? Gotta love the Patriot, never quite gets it right, or perhaps it does.

Did they though?
Militarily NATO was defeated by Serbia.

When working in a bi-polar relationship with the Warsaw Pact? What happened next and why wasn’t NATO dismantled when they took down the Warsaw Pact? Remember, what NATO stands for and why it was set-up? Well, officially.

So, once out of the bi-polar relationship, NATO went rogue and is now a uni-polar, offensive organisation, run by idiots.

CIA launched 1947, same year as Israel. Just a couple of years, before the set-up of what led to NATO.
First exercise of the CIA, was to rescue the Bolshevik and Nanzi Elite in Europe and provide them safe passage, across the Atlantic Ocean.
CIA Director loses his job and in 1961 sets up the Atlantic Council, the ‘NATO Think Tank’ run by those who were given safe passage under the guise of ‘Operation Paperclip’. What could go wrong?

………..

Brief history of NATO, from their own website.

‘…Accordingly, after much discussion and debate, the North Atlantic Treaty was signed on 4 April, 1949. In the Treaty’s renowned Article 5, the new Allies agreed “an armed attack against one or more of them… shall be considered an attack against them all” and that following such an attack, each Ally would take “such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force” in response. Significantly, Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty had important purposes not immediately germane to the threat of attack. Article 3 laid the foundation for cooperation in military preparedness between the Allies, and Article 2 allowed them some leeway to engage in non-military cooperation.

While the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty had created Allies, it had not created a military structure that could effectively coordinate their actions. This changed when growing worries about Soviet intentions culminated in the Soviet detonation of an atomic bomb in 1949 and in the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950. The effect upon the Alliance was dramatic. NATO soon gained a consolidated command structure with a military Headquarters based in the Parisian suburb of Rocquencourt, near Versailles. This was Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, or SHAPE, with US General Dwight D. Eisenhower as the first Supreme Allied Commander Europe, or SACEUR. Soon afterward, the Allies established a permanent civilian secretariat in Paris, and named NATO’s first Secretary General, Lord Ismay of the United Kingdom.

With the benefit of aid and a security umbrella, political stability was gradually restored to Western Europe and the post-war economic miracle began. New Allies joined the Alliance: Greece and Turkey in 1952, and West Germany in 1955. European political integration took its first hesitant steps. In reaction to West Germany’s NATO accession, the Soviet Union and its Eastern European client states formed the Warsaw Pact in 1955. Europe settled into an uneasy stand-off, symbolised by the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961…’

…………………

Ironic, Allen Dulles sets up the Atlantic Council, back in 1961, when they were constructing the first Berlin Wall. What happened next?

NATO created by USA to create homosexual colonies, like Denmark, Latvia, etc…jens becoming more deluded and stupid each day….USA NATO fascists bombed Yugoslavia/and Serbia—after they invaded Copenhagen….LOL

Lol thx John xD Well tbh I thought it doesn’t hurt trying I guess. It was merely an epidermic reaction to an overdose of kindergarten trollish horse shyte piled up in one and a single paragraph I suppose. Those things are hard to ignore at times :-)

Thanks a lot for the accolade Colin,glad to see I’m that alone anymore in that kind of views !

Sure thing mate,sure thing. The whole of the above points I made are indisputable proof that I’m a US propaganda agent. Hollywood is renowned at stating that Putin is the opposite of a commie, has no real respect for Soviet figures other than Stalin,is a conservative God-loving Orthodox that disliked the old regime for its secularism, and that he is a neoliberal slashing pensions to get public funds, and most importantly,that he is a welcome counterweight against America’s supremacy despite this by making Russia a geopolitical giant again standing up for itself and smaller countries that would otherwise be wiped out by the US military machine.

Sure I got all of that on CNN ,Fox and the New York Times. Whatever your solid one-liner says,very convincing. Continue drinking the kool-aid about Putin being so socially humble. He doens’t even hide his massively growing fortune and makes it a pride now, but you do it for him for free.
I hope he notices you.