The Ronin: New Ballistic Helmet By Devtac

You’re welcome, it’s all true.

Do you have more photos of this or videos websides for it. I would like to know more.

Yes, I have photos similar to what’s shown here from the Meier case, from my own experience that I’m not currently releasing publicly for security and privacy reasons. I don’t have a website. My goal is progress, not fame. There are plenty of people doing disclosure. There are very few working on negotiations between ETs and our governments as I am. Trying to bring about our safe and peaceful transition into becoming an ET race ourselves. There are factions opposed to that who want conflict and problems instead. Because that’s what they’re into. So dealing with that is part of what I’m working on.

I’m sorry, that’s too much to sink for me.
I guess that’s because of my skeptic nature, my need of evidence, need to touch and all

I could provide emails, etc., but it would serve no useful purpose to publish it publicly at this time.

Any useful things to know for those who want to counter and abduction attempt?

I carry a gun and if it looks like a lead up to problems I try to get away from them. If you’ve been selected for contact there’s usually an escalatory phase prior to it where you get a heads up that there’s ET/ED interaction. Such as electronics starting to malfunction, abnormal sights, sounds and thought patterns, etc..

It similar to interacting with other sentient and animated life forms like an animal, person, machinary etc.. Except you’re dealing with higher technology and IQs. Some biological, some computers. So far I’ve avoided an abduction attempt. And don’t have any missing time that I’m aware of.

I’m looking for positive contact. If the lead up is questionable I disengage rather than risk problems.

Once you go public, these are some of the issues that you have to deal with:

“UFO photographs:

THE GULF BREEZE SIGHTINGS:

A series of UFO sightings in Gulf Breeze, Florida that have taken place since 1987, but the most concentrated period of sightings was between November 1987 and May 1988 and were centered around Ed and Frances Walters. During this period, Ed claims that aliens have attempted to abduct both him and his wife using a blue ray, but failed. He also claims that he knew when another encounter with a UFO was imminent because he would feel a humming noise in his head. When he got this humming noise, he would rush out with his camera and would take a picture of the UFO, which would be waiting for him in the sky. The Walters took a total of forty photos with various cameras over that period and all of them were evaluated by various scientists and were proved that they were not faked. The most impressive photos included a blue ray that was used to transport people to and from the UFOs, a UFO photographed that was partially obscured by a tree (very hard to fake) and also the same UFO hovering above a highway with a reflection on the road of the bright light on the underside of the UFO.”

http://facteurx.chez.com/gulfbreeze/gb4.jpg

http://www.nationalufocenter.com/artman/uploads/beambluelightgulfbreeze.jpg

Ship on roadway:

http://facteurx.chez.com/gulfbreeze/gb4.jpg

The problem I have with these claims is that they usually don’t accompany suitable evidence, no clear footage, no objects and just blurry images.
One of the best documented UFO encounters I believe is the 1976 Tehran UFO incident, and with the all the documents it’s still considered an Unidentified Flying Object, meaning no clear origin.
There are all kinds of websites with various stories, which I stopped reading a long time ago because I never saw any acceptable proof, so I remain skeptic.

What’s on this thread has either been authenticated in testing laboratories suitable for judicial quality evidence, or I took the pictures myself. I was shown pictures of ships at the Semjase Silver Star Center that are as clear as day. You couldn’t get better quality pictures if you walked out in the parking lot and took a picture of your car with your phone. If a picture has been reproduced there’s a degradation of quality. If you would decide a court case with similar evidence, it should be suitable for determining the authenticity of ET contact.

I’ve been in this building. This and many similar photos have never been duplicated or disproven:

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/Wedding_Cake_infront_house_B_L+highl.jpg

What’s this?

It’s a Plejaren scout ship hovering in the parking lot of the Semjase Silver Star Center in Switzerland.

In the pic near the building what does the red ellipse point to?
And do we have footage of these things or just pictures?
Because I saw fake pictures of similar shape objects and their “making of”, throwing a hubcap or a similar object like a Frisbee or image manipulation and superimposition.

It looks like a hatch on the side of the ship.

Fake pictures don’t pass laboratory analysis. The Meier evidence has been extensively tested to judicial standards and has passed:

“Photographic analysis was performed on Meier’s photographs and films in the late 1970s when Meier first started to publish his photographs. In 1978, a report titled “Preliminary Photo Analysis,” written by physicist Neil M. Davis at Design Technology in Poway, California, provided test results of an analysis of one of Meier’s controversial photographs. Using microscopic examination, density contour plots, examination for evidence of double exposure, photo paste-up, or a model at short range suspended on a string. They state “Nothing was found to indicate a hoax” and concluded, “Nothing was found in the examination of the print which could cause me to believe that the object in the photos is anything other than a large object photographed a distance from the camera.””

http://www.mufon.com/billy-meier—1964-to-present.html

UFO – Billy Meier – 1981 April 3 – Extraterrestrial Beamships – Bachtel …
Video for UFO – Billy Meier – 1981 April 3 – Extraterrestrial Beamships – Bachtel, Switzerland▶ 1:08
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y90a73L89qM

This is what the drives sound like:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNCxHca7c38

Ship in flight from the Meier case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXL694V-Knk

One more thing if you say we are getting ET`s ourselfs do you mean by Gene manipulation or just Flying exploring getting the license to fly to andromeda?

Probably both. Transportation being the primary means. But with the mastery of materials science at the molecular, atomic and sub atomic levels necessary for super lumen faster than the speed of light travel between stars. Comes advances in medical science for life extension and enhanced genetic capabilities. Telekinetics, telepathy, etc..

Thank you for your work, Richard. Sounds to me that a safe and peaceful transition is better than conflict and problems. I understand that some nations have take the ‘attack mode’ approach to contact rather than cooperation.

I think that technology harvesting from crash retrievals is part of it. In terms of hostilities towards ETs. But it goes beyond that to a policy of non compatibility with positive ETs by earth factions that want hegemony, domination and exploitation of both earth people and ETs. These are high IQ ETs who look at the misbehavior of some earth governments and factions as a red flag that they view with caution and limit their interaction accordingly.

I also don’t think that all ETs are problem free either. And that there are good and bad ETs just like there are good and bad elements here. So it’s necessary to play the cards that are being dealt without preconceived misconceptions or assumptions.

This is an antique, though operational, off planet Plajaren beam weapon held by Eduard Meier:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/19fLsAjHYEQ/maxresdefault.jpg

This is the same weapon held by an ET human female:

http://theyfly.com/newsflash91/images/IMG389.jpg

This is the tree that Mr. Meier shot with it, I’ve been to his place, the Semjase Silver Star Center in Switzerland. The ETs have been there too. Including the lady in the above picture. This is a thermal weapon. What I got hit with was some type of non thermal dematerialization beam. If it had been turned up higher I’d be dead. The weapon above can cut down trees if you hold the trigger down and sweep it from side to side:

https://cot.gbcnv.edu/~mbail/F13_FPs/skylerm/finalproject_skylermalolo/photos/tree.jpg

This is a picture that I took at the driveway entrance to the star center:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8de267c8f7c15569a4fb69ef9f9eec766ab1dcace0da7794c9321cbad11635e1.jpg

This is from a contact recon op in the Rocky Mountains:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/60c8db7a030288501dfafbdf750384d5bed090edcd91757da0f39a10e7f435e4.jpg

This is some of my security equipment:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4149fed3dd6ee3fb93473f8be4d80c845c7b142689e3c73dcf4f3d7798419ebb.png

do you happen to have a DAO Ruger? can’t remember the model, but the same of the one in the pic, only in DAO version? I’m interested in its performance.

The Keltec on top is DAO, the Rugar on the bottem is both double action and single action. I don’t have a DAO Rugar. My other pistols are an H & K 26.5 mm single shot break action flare gun, a CZ-52 in 7.62 x 25, which is a bottle neck sub machine gun round, and a Keltec P32 .32 ACP (automatic Colt pistol).

Which is my primary carry piece do to it’s light weight and small size. A head and chest magazine dump at close range will stop most aggressors. Or at 8 shots, one in the chamber and 7 in the magazine. It’s enough for double taps, 2 to the head and 2 to the chest, for 2 aggressors. I also have 10 round extended magazines for it.

In the woods I carry the 9mm or 7.62 x 25 for large predatory carnivores like wolves, mountain lions and bear. The Tokarev round for the CZ-52 at 1,700 fps could be effective against brown bear. Because it has a lot more penetration than the 9mm. The 9mm will stop most black bear and is effective at close range against wolves and cat.

These are the actions for the guns in the picture:

“One of the lightest and flattest 9mm pistols ever made, the PF-9™ is also one of the most concealable. This semi-automatic has a double action only firing mechanism”

https://www.keltecweapons.com/pistols/pf-9

“Light double-action and crisp single-action trigger pulls. External hammer is designed with a rounded spur for easy cocking and single-action shooting.”

http://www.ruger.com/products/sr22Pistol/models.html

jeez, a .22,

I thought it was a niner, and was asking about the sr-9 DAO model (saw it now at ruger website).

Thanks for the information mate

There are threaded barrels, factory suppressors and sub sonic ammunition available for it. For circumstances when you don’t want to cause a disturbance.

“and sub sonic ammunition available for it”

k, but i never heard of supersonic pistol ammunition.. how do they explain it?

A bullet traveling below the speed of sound doesn’t break the sound barrier and create a ballistic crack mini sonic boom. They’re a lot quieter.

i know i know.
but pistol rounds have always been subsonic.

you wrote they sell subsonic rounds like they normally sell supersonic ones.

A lot of the pistol ammunition with light bullets or hot loads is over 1,100 fps, which is the speed of sound. Even out of a pistol. My SR22 is the 5 inch long slide. Adding a suppressor can increase the velocity.

BBTI – Ballistics by the Inch
http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/

nice info, thanks

Top 5 Subsonic .22 Long Rifle Loads
https://www.americanhunter.org/articles/2016/7/9/top-5-subsonic-22-long-rifle-loads/

?!