Click to see the full-size image
Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst
There are very few countries in history that are as Russophobic as the United Kingdom. This pathological hatred for all things Russian goes back centuries in many Western countries. Even when Moscow and London were fighting on the same side, the latter always sought to undermine the former, usually by looking to balance an ongoing conflict in a way that makes sure Russia loses the most while gaining as little as possible.
This was the case during the Napoleonic and both world wars. Worse yet, Winston Churchill supported a number of plans for wars against the Soviet Union right after WW2, including the infamous “Operation Unthinkable”, when the UK openly planned to use atomic weapons to “impose its will on Russia”. There’s certainly no shortage of rabid Russophobia in Europe and the political West in general, but London really gives the likes of Poland and the Baltic states a run for their money.
It should be noted that the pathological hatred for Russia in the UK is quite difficult to explain with the rather simplified logic of “thalassocracy vs. tellurocracy” competition. There are other tellurocracies that London could surely focus on, but it’s still dead set on hurting Moscow’s interests, so there has to be something more to it. By making Russophobia perhaps the main constant of its politics for centuries, the UK is quite literally jeopardizing its own existence. The Kremlin is aware of all this, which is why it has been considering the option of cutting even the most basic diplomatic ties with Downing Street. And who could possibly blame Russia given the fact that the UK is doing everything in its power to destroy whatever’s left of their relationship? London has simply crossed all red lines. However, it seems things are going to get a lot worse, as evidenced by the new British government’s belligerent rhetoric.
Namely, in yet another move tantamount to a declaration of war, the new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer fully supported the use of UK-sourced “Storm Shadow” air-launched cruise missiles against targets within Russia’s undisputed territory, with no apparent limitations. Starmer’s Labour Party won the general election on July 4, with him confirmed as the new PM on July 5. Just four days later, he reiterated that the British government supports the unrestricted use of its long-range weapons against Moscow. Starmer gave the statement while en route to the NATO summit in Washington DC. As per usual, he insisted that it was “up to Ukraine how it uses the missiles”, a ludicrous excuse that nearly all Western “leaders” like to use, despite being fully aware that the Neo-Nazi junta has no actual sovereignty to speak of. Worse yet, it relies solely on instructions from NATO on what to attack next.
Further supplies of long-range weapons to the Kiev regime will most likely be one of the central topics of the NATO summit and the UK is expected to be among the first to support the initiative. And indeed, London has supported virtually every escalatory move since the start of the special military operation (SMO), including the deliveries of depleted uranium munitions. This fact alone makes Starmer’s statement that “the missiles must obviously be used in accordance with international humanitarian law as you would expect” all the more laughable, as depleted uranium is among the worst weapons one could possibly deliver to a warzone. And yet, the UK was the first country to do so. At the time, it insisted that this was for “defensive purposes only”, and that’s precisely what Starmer said about the “Storm Shadow” missiles, which are clearly offensive deep-strike weapons.
The missile has a maximum range of 550 km, although NATO insists it delivered only a downgraded export version with a range of up to 300 km. However, given its history of lies and deceit, this has to be taken with a mountain of salt. Considering the “Storm Shadow’s” maximum range, this means that areas as far as Kaluga, a city in the relative vicinity of the Moscow oblast (region), can be targeted. It also covers nearly all of Belarus with the exception of the northern portion of the country.
The fact that much of Western Russia will be in range opens up a plethora of possibilities for uncontrollable escalation, but the UK’s mindless Russophobia seems to be clouding its judgment. Instead of focusing on its own issues, including years of unprecedented recession, economic and societal problems, London is rushing to war with the world’s premier thermonuclear superpower.
And yet, nothing seems to be enough for British warmongering politicians. After Boris Johnson made sure that the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict continues, resulting in over half a million Ukrainian deaths, the UK kept sending not only ever more advanced and longer-range weapons to the Kiev regime, but even the previously mentioned pointless depleted uranium munitions that British tanks didn’t even get the chance to use (partly because London insisted on keeping these tanks away from the frontlines).
Still, to make things worse, back in May last year, the mainstream propaganda machine reported that British special forces, specifically SAS (Special Air Service), SRR (Special Reconnaissance Regiment) and SBS (Special Boat Service), are directly involved in the fighting. And yet, by February this year, it turned out that this was merely the tip of the iceberg.
Namely, at the time, the Times essentially praised the British military’s contribution to the destruction of Russian naval assets. According to the report, the UK’s General Staff, headed by Admiral Tony Radakin, directly took part in planning and executing attacks on the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Radakin also seems to have been involved in other covert operations in Ukraine, all aimed at diminishing Russian capabilities.
Worse yet, it seems that other NATO assets have also been involved, presumably various ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) platforms, meaning that London certainly wasn’t alone in this “noble endeavor”. In other words, this isn’t a simple arming of the Neo-Nazi junta forces, but a direct participation in hostilities. For all intents and purposes, it amounts to a declaration of war and all of it despite the horrendous state of the UK military (which is only getting worse).
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
now ru has the right to hit uk targets all over the world. tsunamis happen, specially in the north sea , so get some boats ready in the fuckingham palace
well, jews are considering all other people “untermensch” and britons are 2nd most racist nation in the world after jews. they have in fact 3 categories of people, britons, people from former colonies and all others. slavs are not from former british colonies so it explains their attitude towards russia.. britons consider all slavs a 3rd category. funny that they have no problems with pakistani mayor of london. in their twisted world, pakistan is more civilized country then serbia for example.
you are wrong. in london there is only 35% of the population still white. the britons aren’t racists. it’s the exact opposite. they are so brainwashed by their globalists leaders that they prefer to die than beeing labelled racist.
around about the same percentage of the electorate that voted the human rights lawyer in.
amerikunt most racist—australia new zekeland then dumbmark
the recent uk general election gave something like 18% of the votes cast to nigel farage, of the reform uk party. he committed the unpardonable sin during his time in the eu parliament 10 years ago of saying that war would break out in ukraine because of nato’s pushing its borders east; and he repeated this prior to the election recently.
the orc invaders must be eliminated…heheheh
go back to elementary school and start get an introductory history lesson. maybe then you can begin to understand things beyond the 3rd grade level. stupnik.
if wishes were fishes, you’d be a floundering flounder.
you will be drafted soon and then you can finally show the world what you made off instead of spouting nonsense from the basement of your parents house which will be destroyed during the war along with your mommy and daddy while you sit in the trench waiting for your demise. keep it up!
we serfs very stupid, we alsto need elimination.
uk was the money behind the bolshevik attack on the russian government in 1917, and since the russian people tossed them out of power they fled to there and now have a vendetta against russia. nato is the murdering arm of them and the wef.
government was treated by generals. head of the staff general alexeev arrested nikolay ii and forced him to resign. liberals from parliament appointed kerenskiy as the head of new republican government after the february rebolution in 1917. lenin was in switzerland at that moment, trotskiy — in the us. they came in petrograd and created common parliament with the rest republicans. in summer the capital was pro-lenin. in october lenin too the power and kicked kerenskiy out.
liberals recognized first ukro pseudo-state — so called ukr.people republic in kiev with s.petlyura and m.grushevskiy. lenin took kiev back to russia after another coup of general skoropadskiy with german troops. petlyura moved to paris, grushevskiy to moskva, because he was a socialist and lenin’s party was small in numbers, so local revolutionists/republicans allied with lenin and took power in kiev, thus ukrainization policy continued till 1930’s, stalin made it softer, but not stopped it.
it has nothing to do with 1917, ithas all to do with british ego, because they are still thinking they are a superpower but in reality they are a shithole. they desperately wanted to “project power” somewhere and they concluded russia is the perfect target for bullying. but it is not their fault as the 1st target was yugoslavia and russia proved to be super weak and super cowardly, hence the bullying of russia. blame putin and his perverted hobby to “please western partners”.
it has everything to do with 1917. tavistock institute of human behaviour, formed just after the fed reserve came into power. rockerfeller, two dublin media barons, who ran the daily mail and daily mirror (right and left) together with the british monarchy set up the tihb in order to use ‘mind control’ to convince the citizens of the us and uk, who were pacifists, to change their minds and embrace wwi. how many empires fell around that time? we have all been played.
amh still speaking sense years later.
it was us jews who organized the bolshevik coup – specifically, jacob schiff from kuhn loeb in nyc. but you are right in naming the jew – the enemy of the whole world.
msn “uk hasn’t allowed ukraine to use storm shadow missiles inside russia, mod clarifies” – not everything happens quite as expected, have to see how things develop.
bullshit. it is the same as give a 5 year old boy real steel hammer as a toy and tell him – you must not destroy anything. ukrainians are in fact worse then 5 years old boys. they are brainless.
the former leader of the labour party was jeremy corbyn who was more pro-russia and wanted to leave nato in line with hard left ideals, some of the trade union leaders are pro-russia, the labour party government contains those elements, they should be more inclined to de-escalate than the conservatives. and they also owe their election success in part to the more pro-russian reform uk taking conservative votes.
yeah, but that starmer is a bigger dope than scholz
but scotland is not so rusophobic. i stand for independent people republic of scotland.
like blair and brown, the scottish labour mps that went onto become prime ministers of the united kingdom. if england, the only part of the uk, without their own parliament or assembly had been offered a vote on a referendum, they would have voted scotland to be independent.
bush’s poodle and brown are also russophobes, because they are part of the system. you can’t rise high, if you are against mainstream. british press is the most russophobic in eu since first newspapers not depending from names in office. ordinary people have much less such sentiments. people from scotland and (northern) ireland are more positive towards russia and skeptic towards “exclusive nation” than average people from streets in england as i’ve noticed for my life.
at this stage of the game, one has to have already concluded with no doubt left that the british are certifiable and should be dispatched to the nearest mental asylum post haste.
it will have in fact very real and very simple solution. nukes.
i heard one us senator saying that the brits can never allow scotland to secede because if it did, the island would be bottom heavy and tip over into the sea.
breaking news from the flat earth. i know it was a joke, but some real senators are not smarter.
rep. hank johnson said he feared if 8,000 marines were stationed on guam it would “become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.”
which country do you think will be used to end the start of ww3 by totally destroying it with nuclear weapons? will it be ukraine (giant buffer zone), london or america?
poland, of course, they have unique experience in this matter.
i think sf didn’t get it right again. british want to be superpower as they are yet another example of failed state. the problem is that the world is split in us vassals, chinese vassals and permanent warzones. so british concluded they must do better job then us and started to bully russia. poland has the very same intensions and what is the most laughable, pribaltics are the next ones. so the british are in the same rank as poles and pribaltics. :)
meantime, u.s. is giving weapons to israel as u.s. as truly nazi state loves wars on 2 fronts at once, one ukraine was not enough. and as for as ukraine, they are a nation who just won a darwin prize. the west is eager to fight russia to the last ukrainian and this will solve problem of ukraine permanently. poland is the next candidate for darwin’s prize on the list. it will be quite funny when russia and germany will have common borders again. i think it will be sooner then most people expect.
without an empire to exploit, the british isle is about as humanly productive as the galapagos. the japanese, with a comparable isle in size, at least have a work ethic.
what ever happened to the british isles? the rest of the isles decided to paddle away?
what will happen is that sooner or later the russians will hand over weapons to the enemies of britain and other countries that are using ukraine to attack russia and the you can imagine what that will entail for those who be on the other side of the stick. time to wake up and stop following the demented retard joe biden whose democratic party has managed to bring the world on the brink of total nuclear destruction.
keir stermer, the human rights lawyer, who refused to prosecute saville and now wants the uk to launch their missiles into russia. what could go wrong? human rights lawyer, who wants a thermo-nuclear war with a nuclear triad superpower. why are so many friends of jimmy saville, hell bent in taking us out?
human rights lawyer? what a joke. i’ll bet the little three monkeys twerp didn’t say a word over the odessa massacre and a whole lot more.
starmer is pure scum. he has been recorded saying one thing and then the complete opposite on many occasions. but as for the “human rights lawyer,” it’s important to understand that the word human is defined in the law dictionaries as “a kind of monster,” so the entire field is by no means what it seems.
starmer is married to a jew, his children are being brought up as jews, he was seen watching the football world cup in 2022 in a gay club, he is pictured wearing women’s clothes – all this make him a jew too, as was js, the “most jewish man in leeds” as he described himself. it’s jews who are taking the world to war, the chabad sect that trump belongs to, as does his daughter and son in law, think that a world war will bring their messiah back sooner. it’s always all about the jews.
that’s a bit too nutsy cuckoo for my palette but i’m half way on board, if that’s any consolation.
we should clearly understand that the origin of this russophobia is not english, but jewish. jews have controlled britain since cromwell invited them back into the kingdom in the mid-17th century. jews hate russia because the tsars refused to let them have a central bank there, and they hate putin for eliminating oligarchic control. unless you understand the nature of the jew, you understand nothing.
the russophobia stems from the norman conquest ordered by pope alexander the 2nd to recover londinium – which has always been a city-state. the anglo-saxons – whom our norman masters refer to as ‘little englanders’ – have been a conquered people ever since. the holy roman empire still hasn’t given up trying to recoup the financial losses it suffered when orthodoxy was excommunicated in 1054. demonizing the ‘other side’ is classic conflict theory.
dr.karadzich very good, nite from curtonistan now in english preson getting good dicking from a brothar moslam.
yes of course, the czar asked his cousin the king of england asylum which was refused because he was in on the conspiracy. and rasputin wanted to end the war with germany with his influence and was finished off with a bullet from a british agent. the white russians were even winning the war against the bolsheviks until england cut off weapon deliveries. i rest my case.
russia must be punished because it’s led by fascist junta.
azov founded a chapter there? who knew?