Click to see full-size image
Zelensky’s unhinged commentary is deeply dividing for virtually all NATO members, as none of them wants to be destroyed in minutes for the sake of a corrupt Neo-Nazi regime.
Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst
In early October last year, Kiev regime frontman Volodymyr Zelensky called on NATO to launch a “preemptive nuclear strike” on Russia in order to “rule out the possibility of using nuclear weapons”. At the time, the mainstream propaganda machine tried everything in its power to present his words as allegedly “misinterpreted”, but since there is actual footage of it, we’ll let you decide if he genuinely said so:
“What should NATO do? Eliminate the possibility of Russia using nuclear weapons. But what is important, I once again appeal to the international community, as it was before February 24: pre-emptive strikes, so that they know what will happen to them if used. And not vice versa – wait for Russia’s nuclear strikes, then to say: ‘Oh, you are so, well, keep it from us!’ Reconsider the application of their pressure, the procedure for applying,” Zelensky said during a video conference with the Australian Lowy Institute.
While the aforementioned propaganda narrative tried to whitewash (a standard practice for virtually anything the Neo-Nazi junta does) his statement about these “preemptive strikes” by claiming these supposedly “wouldn’t be nuclear”, this is openly implied in the comment itself. How else would it be possible to launch strikes against a nuclear power, much less the one with the world’s most powerful thermonuclear arsenal?
Why is this relevant now, approximately ten months later? Zelensky’s unhinged commentary is deeply dividing for virtually all NATO members, as none of them wants to be destroyed in minutes for the sake of a corrupt Neo-Nazi regime. The ongoing NATO summit in Vilnius makes Zelensky look no less delusional, as he threw yet another tantrum, complaining that the political West is “not doing enough” because it doesn’t want to make a firm promise to let the Kiev regime into NATO. Apparently, he is “deeply frustrated” with the regular pattern of the belligerent alliance making “pledges”, giving billions in so-called aid (over $170 billion, to be exact), promising to deliver F-16 fighter jets, while also expanding its military infrastructure in Eastern Europe.
Although NATO promised it will remove the Membership Action Plan (MAP) requirement for the Neo-Nazi junta, an unprecedented move by the aggressive alliance, Zelensky was still “furious at the alliance’s soft language on full membership”. He threw a fit at NATO, particularly at the United States, for refusing to lay out “a clear path” for the Kiev regime’s membership. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg previously promised to push for a fast-tracked process that would be implemented at some point in the future, when the belligerent alliance decides “it’s ready to seriously consider” the Neo-Nazi junta’s membership application. This explains why the MAP requirement was dropped.
What makes the move unprecedented is the fact that the MAP was a virtually mandatory agreement that all other NATO candidates had to implement since 1999. However, once again, this was “not enough” for Zelensky. Just before arriving in Vilnius and meeting there with Biden, Zelensky grumbled at all those “not ready” to make the membership happen as soon as possible (which is “now” according to his “logic”):
“This looks like there’s neither readiness to invite Ukraine to NATO nor make it a member of the alliance.”
He stated that “such an unprecedented and absurd outcome leaves an opportunity to make Ukraine’s NATO membership bid a trading chip in potential negotiations with Russia”, adding that “certain wording is being discussed without Ukraine” and that “all of this only plays into Russia’s hands”. He effectively accused his geopolitical masters of “opening the door for Russia to continue its terror”, saying:
“While at the same time vague wording about ‘conditions’ is added even for inviting Ukraine. It seems there is no readiness neither to invite Ukraine to NATO nor to make it a member of the Alliance. This means that a window of opportunity is being left to bargain Ukraine’s membership in NATO in negotiations with Russia. And for Russia, this means motivation to continue its terror. Uncertainty is weakness. And I will openly discuss this at the summit.”
Amid the embarrassingly disastrous performance of NATO weapons in the failed counteroffensive by the Kiev regime forces, the summit serves to present the belligerent alliance as “united”, although it’s more than clear that there are no battlefield successes the political West was desperate for its favorite puppet regime to achieve. Thus, yet another bureaucratic “success” was presented as “crucial” for the Neo-Nazi junta’s “eventual membership”, after “all conditions are met”. And the condition is – Kiev must defeat Moscow. This means that the much-touted NATO membership will certainly not happen at the Vilnius summit or anytime soon, as the belligerent alliance simply cannot give the Neo-Nazi junta any sort of security guarantee.
President Biden himself stated that the membership plan cannot be seriously considered until after the conflict is over, clearly implying that NATO’s Article 5 would be the main obstacle in the Kiev regime’s bid for membership.
“I don’t think there is unanimity in NATO about whether or not to bring Ukraine into the NATO family now, at this moment, in the middle of a war,” Biden told CNN just before going to Vilnius, adding: “For example, if you did that, then, you know – and I mean what I say – we’re determined to commit every inch of territory that is NATO territory. It’s a commitment that we’ve all made no matter what. If the war is going on, then we’re all in war. We’re at war with Russia, if that were the case.”
Rationality and Joe Biden are certainly not words one would expect to see in the same sentence, but in this case, at least some credit should be given to the US president, as this stance is the only rational one a leader of a global power can be expected to have. However, precisely this is what Zelensky is criticizing as a supposed “weakness”. For him, the “only rational” thing NATO should do is go into a full-scale war with Russia.
zelensky is desperate, like south’s bots commenting on generic things and claiming fake news against russia🤓🇺🇦💩
zelensky is one dimensional, he demands more and more weapons acting like he is taking care of the worlds problems while criticizing those who give support for not giving more support. he forgot to thank those who have gave him everything and so they are now done with him and have kicked him to the curb. war over in 54321.
russia didn’t go in to ukraine without the knowledge they can annihilate the nato. not that russia needs any help, there are a bunch of militarily strong countries in asia that are ready to annihilate the nato if this thing gets hot.
like who exactly? north korea? vietnam is already incorporating its business in the eu. not to mention fantastic and hard working vietnamese society growing up in the eu. hundred of thousands of vietnamese people live in poland and everyone loves them! poles value them as they are family orientated as well as hard working! vietnamese people as more than welcome in the eu!
how many nuclear deterrent nations are partners with russia in brics?
according to global firepower, us is largest military. most expensive, and largest, but, not most powerful. russia is 2nd, despite the fact that the us spends just under $700 billion more on defence than russia. china, comes in 3rd, followed by india. russia, like the us is a nuclear triad nation, china is almost there, and india is like france and uk, only one source of nuclear deterrent.
vietnam if it gets “too hot” it’s not just nato that will pay the price, we all will.🌎🌍🌏☢️🚀🚀💥💥💥🔥🔥🔥💀⚫
for decades west was waiting for russia to join democracy path. it didn’t happened, russia was a mafia state and over the years it embraced the criminal way the country was run. now the west just said it is over. no more russian influence, no more russian billioners making business in london, berlin or new york. of course west wouldn’t risk war with russia – it would ruin both sides – but west can simply wait… and be patient… russia is already on the path for self destruction
are you mistaking the city of london created bolshevik soviet union, or the city of london oligarch controlled russia, when yeltsin was in charge, back in the last century? funny how the bolsheviks are now running washington dc and the bolshevik european union, with the city of london in control and running the script.
looking at the “little corporal” standing alone while nato celebrities mingle; a picture worth a thousand words.
“presumption is the mother of every screw-up”
(belgrade graffiti)
if kyiv presumed someone else is going their fight, for example someone like this cowardice alliance of “cheater, looter and stealers”… my condolences.