Military Situation In Mariupol On March 23, 2022 (Map Update)

Yes, that is one possibility, and I hope you are right on that.
But the other option is, that Putin is such a pig, that he deliberately sacrificed these thousands of young christian russian soldiers, in order to mislead his opponents into thinking he is weak, when in fact he is strong. Posing weak in Ukraine – showing as if unable to overrun that (in comparison to Russia) small country, and then suddenly storming in Blitzkrieg-style westwards through whole of Europe, from Poland , to Germany to France and Netherlands. And overrun a completely surprised NATO. Yes, I know that this might sound somewhat far fetched, but please read the prophecies of Alois Irlmaier and others and you will see that lots of seers foresee and Russian sudden invasion of Europe.

I think and hope that NATO military planners are already drawing up potential invasion scenarios by Russia using the data analysis available from Ukraine. We’ve never seen Russia attempting to invade a large country using this modern post Soviet army. This is a major military lesson for anyone who was wondering what a modern invasion of Europe would look like. It’s pretty much certain that any neighbour of Russia who detects military buildup at this borders needs to take it seriously and prepare for war.

You can prepare but EU would need 10years and a few $trillions to be able to do that.

Lol which think tank in dc did that crack dream came out of.

Lunacy!

No, it’s not far-fetched. It’s brilliant. You found the secret to real enlightenment and wisdom. When did it first occur to you that shoving GHB up your ass while you inhale paint thinner was the path to true knowledge?

Idiot, I told you already that different seers from Nostradamus to Alois Irlmaier foresaw these events.

We are now at point 5 of the Irlmaier Prophecy, with all points before, having already become reality. See:

The Third World War, which Alois Irlmaier prophesied in the 50s and the signs of the coming Third World War before it starts :

1. First comes a prosperity like never before!
2. This is followed by an apostasy like never before.
3. On it a moral corruption like never before.
4. Then a large number of strangers come into the country.
5. There is a lot of inflation. The money loses more and more value.
6. Soon after, the revolution follows.
7. Then the Russians invade the West overnight.

https://www.grenzwissenschaftler.com/2015/04/08/die-vorzeichen-des-sehers-alois-irlmaier-zum-3-weltkrieg/

LOL…dude, I had to write that shit down.

I have read these prophecies and what he’s doing now is part of them. He’ll plant his flag in Rome. something like that. I don’t see him as evil like my Government though.

Dont be too shocked if they still take the whole of Ukraine.

Russia doesn’t want to take the whole Ukraine you demented junkie.

Lol, indeed it doesn’t, once they are done cooking ukro army in eastern cauldrons there won’t be any ukkie army left to defend ukrostan and ukros will fall

I think the plan is to starve Ukraine out, disrupt it’s economy, it’s political and social life and harass them until they are ready to lay down arms and accept a deal. From the Russian point of view, Ukraine has already lost the war on the ground. Probably there will be fighting and skirmishing along the front line for as long as Russian troops are on the territory of Ukraine. Perhaps Russia has understood by now that bombing cities is unproductive from an international PR perspective. Killing civilians is also not great for similar reasons. The more Russian forces are stationed on the territory of Ukraine, the weaker the special military operation narrative will become. It’s important that the denazification narrative is demolished, and the political and national legitimacy of Ukraine is recognized by Russia. Also it needs to be acknowledged that Russia has invaded another country, an independent state which was always peaceful and non-aggressive towards is neighbours. Of course everyone agrees with the Russian military superiority there was never a question about that. But Russia has failed to demonstrate to anyone that this invasion was legally and morally justified. In that sense they will have it difficult to achieve their stated goals.

With other words, Russia is presented with a dilemma.

If it moves in more forces, it’s becoming clear that it’s a war, logistics are hard pressed even more.

If it doesn’t, it has to achieve its targets with a force to small to accomplish anything else than occupying the east it currently has.

At the same time it has to make the Ukraine suffer, while not being obvious with it, to get the demands through it wants.

That’s incredibly difficult to achieve.

Yes exactly. And that’s why Russia is trying to hard to hide the extent of its military loses from the Russian public. I mean, if an army loses more troops than any war they have fought in the past 80 years, they can’t call it a special operation anymore. Russia is playing a game of definition and semantics with the Russian people. It takes painful facts to debunk their own propaganda. It’s like walking a tightrope. I think the flattening of Mariupol and elimination of resistance is enough to demolish the special military operation narrative. Civilian casualties are likely to be horrific already. Of course Russia will get to count the dead, but Ukraine has population records and they can do their own estimations too. Also there will be independent research. The truth will come out.

And as Russia failed to prepare its propaganda narrative according to the current situation, nor spent enough time to create a filter bubble to keep independent thinking in check, it’s fighting a losing battle even at the home front.

The military losses will break the narrative anyway, no matter how many mercs are recalled from Wagner, are imported from Syria or Chechnya. And there people will ask questions too.

That can easily turn into Russia’s second Vietnam/Afghanistan.

I think the underlying narrative that’s widely understood among the Russian supporters of this war is that there will be territorial gains as a result. I’m not sure why ordinary Russians are so enamoured with the territory of Ukraine. They have these national narratives about the birth place of the the Russian nation and the inferiority of the Ukrainian people. In a way the Russian propaganda is careful construed to play on already existing stereotypes within the mind of the Russians about Ukraine. People are more ready to accept propaganda when it reinforces their existing beliefs and when it’s presented to have a positive convenient outcome. Then when the backslash from the sanctions become evident, it’s already too late because 75% of the people are already committed to this war. The deal was sold to the Russians before the invasion started. Since the majority of the world doesn’t share the Russian historical narrative about Ukraine, and indeed Ukrainians themselves don’t share it, it’s very difficult for the justifications of the Russian state to stick outside Russia, giving the absence of the necessary cognitive foundations.

Indeed, propaganda always should use existing thought lines, as it simply rides on top of them.

Can’t judge how far the narrative already sunk in with the Russian population, but it surely is too short a time to create an effective war narrative.

But if there are really territorial gains in the end is still not decided.

That’s right that’s what the Nazis did too. They ideology was built upon the widespread and malignant anti-semitism present in the social landscape of the time. It wasn’t hard to demonize the Jews. They were demonized already in the minds of the people of the time. Goes to show that politicians often ride the currents of widespread popular belief. It’s hard to believe that in the 21st century there still are are large nations who’s majority population could be convinced of the necessity and usefulness of large scale invasions of neighboring countries. Probably the revelation that the Russians are in favor of territorial expansion came after the annexation of Crimea which was widely supported by the Russian people. Then Putin realized that his warmongering thoughts weren’t just his own, but were shared by a vast chunk of the population.

Well, the most dangerous empire is a humiliated empire that goes down. That’s still stuck in the Russian mindset, the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The west didn’t really care about it and expanded its influence sphere towards the east, a further humiliation. There have been warnings about it, that Russia would try to turn back the wheel of time.

The main issue is, this was blinding the Russians, including their administration and political leadership.
___

Not sure what’s going on in the north of Kiev right now, seems that Ukraine was/is more successful than what has been expected again. But lets wait for further news regarding that.

Unfortunately for people like you, it won’t.
As I said in my previous comment to your mediocre comments, you must revise your narrative, because it is incredibly like the «mainstream» propaganda of the failed USA and it senile old president.

“Also it needs to be acknowledged that Russia has invaded another country, an independent state which was always peaceful and non-aggressive towards is neighbours.”

Sorry, unacceptably dishonest premise. Try again!

Russia succeed easy against NATO, Ukrain win in the média mainstream and in Hollywood🇺🇸🎥🎬 movies. 🗼France🇫🇷 against Algérie 1954-1962.
France loose. USA loose in Afghanistan and Irak. USA and Ukrain, maffia States with the zionistanz

Too late, despite suppression, the whole world is seeing how ugly this little fascist regime is in Ukraine. Now all the Western PR organs are being identified and they will be asked why they are supporting Nazis. The tide is turning.

Yesterday, they took 137 military objectives in 24 hours. Today, it was 96 military objectives. At this pace, by the end of April your despicable nazi army in Ukraine will be in tatters. Revise your military coordinations. Right now, they are in a mess and worse: you are doing what CNN and Sky News does on TV – disinforming the public.

I am in East Africa and even here we can tell from the information presented by various sources that Ukraine had ammassed a Nato supported sizable army to invade the Donboss. Another army was entrenched in the North which would block Russian armies coming to the aid of the two republics. From the point of veiw of miltary experts here who actually fight a lot not like TV generals, different small platoons of Russian specialists were dispassed to different cities to tie up the remnants of Ukie armies. Destrcution of Ukrainean armies in the East would mean the “end” of the main combat operations. What do you think?

Can’t? HAHAHAHAHAHA….

Russia doesn’t need to take all of Ukraine, because Ukraine is going to be Partitioned. Poland will take much of the west, Hungary, Romania will take back their territory. What do you think the purpose of “Peacekeepers” are? To confront the Russian army? Don’t be daft. It is to occupy land to be reclaimed and with the whole hearted endorsement of Zelenskyy.

I’ve always been in favor for NATO intervention in Ukraine. It’s still possible. They don’t have to put troops on the ground just provide aerial bombardment support on Russian positions. That would help tip the balance of this war in Ukraine’s favor. Those Russian convoys could have been bombed long ago. Russia would have been forced to withdraw. Peace would have been achieved. But NATO is scared shitless of nuclear escalation. And Putin is mad enough to push the button and risk sacrificing the Russian people. Still I don’t think he would be allowed to do it.

No fly zone is playing with very big fires. This could easily escalate beyond control.

One way or the other it will escalate anyway. As the whole thing was only started by Putin, in order to later escalate into World War 3. USA, EU, Russia and China are ruled by the same rootless hook-nosed clique, they are the NWO/JWO and want WW3 and Armageddon.

Yes, it will escalate beyond your control, because Russia will win. Make no mistake about it and your pityful Ukraine will be denazified.

Schicklgruber ( aka Hitler) was not Jewish, but their were some rumors his GRANDFATHER was born to a 42 year old maria Shickelgrubber and a 19 year old Frankenburger.

Hitler’s DNA Y ( male) Haplogroup based on testing of the remaining male line of his family is supposed to be E1b1b1 ( now called M35 ).

This is found at a very low rate in Ashkenazic Jews of about 1.3% ( if you don’t add in E-M123, which is not Hitlers Haplogroup in any case).

“Behar (2004b) deemed sub-clade E-M35* a “major founding lineage” among Ashkenazim. But according to Semino (2004), E-M35* only occurs among 1.3% of Ashkenazim and among 2.5% of Sephardim. Behar, on the other hand, reports finding E-35 at a frequency of 7.1% among Eastern European Ashkenazim, versus 19.1% among Ashkenazim in the west. Not only do Behar’s figures contrast sharply with that found by Semino, but Behar also apparently discovered a significant difference in the frequency of this sub-group between eastern and western Jews. The discrepancy between Behar and Semino’s results may be attributable to Behar including sub-clade E-M123 results within his larger E-M35 category. The fact that E-M123 does not appear separately as part of Behar’s data suggests that he did, in fact, combine these sub-clades into a single category.”

https://egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=006301

A 1.5% occurrence in Jews of his area makes VERY IMPROBABLE that Hitler had a Jewish Grandfather.

Even if he had a Jewish Grandfather, that would not make him Jewish by Jewish Law ( Torah), to be Jewish by Jewish law one needs a Jewish born or Converted MOTHER, and your tribe comes from the Father.

So, despite the sleazy Headlines, Hitler was no Jew.

Zelensky is a Big question. We know he defines himself as Cristian, maybe his father was Jewish.