Illustrative image.
Hezbollah has begun a major strategic review that includes considering scaling back its role as an armed movement without disarming completely, Reuters reported on July 4, citing three sources familiar with the deliberations.
The group took heavy losses during the last war with Israel, which continues to launch strikes against Lebanon and refuses to withdraw from five strategic posts in the south of the country, challenging a ceasefire brokered by the United States last November.
One of the sources who spoke to Reuters revealed that Hezbollah had been holding clandestine discussions on its next steps. Small committees have been meeting in person or remotely to discuss issues including the group’s leadership structure, political role, social and development work, and weapons, the official said.
According to the report, Hezbollah is also considering handing over missiles and drones, but not anti-tank missiles and guns, provided Israel withdraws its remaining troops from southern Lebanon.
Hezbollah’s leader Naim Qassem said in a speech on July 2 that the “Lebanese resistance” would not surrender its weapons and “will not accept being humiliated” or accept “surrendering its land or weapons to the Israeli enemy, nor will it accept relinquishing the rights guaranteed by international and divine laws.”
“Hezbollah has an agreement with Israel indirectly through the Lebanese state. Let Israel abide by the agreement it concluded with the Lebanese state,” he said, adding that Israel has made thousands of violations of the ceasefire agreement that came into effect.
A recent report by the Saudi Al Hadath channel said that Hezbollah suggested that it was open to the idea of withdrawing “to the north” after Israel removes its troops from southern Lebanon.
Meanwhile, Al Akhbar newspaper, a Lebanese newspaper close to Hezbollah, said that a Lebanese with ties to the American administration was negotiating with Hezbollah about the assurances the group would be given in exchange for disarming.
While giving up on heavy weapons like missiles and drones can be seen as a defeat to Hezbollah, such a daring step could in fact make the group stronger.
Hezbollah built its reputation as a highly-capable professional force during the 1990s. At the time the group had just a few thousand ideological-motivated, highly-trained, and well-equipped fighters. Most of the group’s operations were well-planned and executed raids and ambushes that inflicted heavy losses on the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and its proxy, the Southern Lebanon Army.
In the early 2000s, the group very much followed the same approach. During the war of 2006, which is widely considered one of Israel’s biggest military failures, the group reportedly fought with just one thousand fighters.
However, the war saw Hezbollah expanding the use of heavy rockets and the group’s first use of other types of advanced weapons such as anti-ship missiles and suicide drones. Israel took losses, but only because the IDF was not prepared for such threats.
What followed the 2006 war was a very ambitious expansion of Hezbollah and a major shift in the group’s tactics from asymmetric to more traditional warfare.
This change became clear when Hezbollah intervened in Syria after 2011 to support the government of its ally, President Bashar al-Assad.
The group fought like a regular army there, employing heavy weapons like main battle tanks and armored personnel carriers. Reports also revealed that it began to prioritize the expansion of its missile and drone arsenal, even working to build a complete air defense network in Lebanon.
Amid the war in Syria, the group leader Hassan Nassrallah boasted about having more than one hundred thousand fighters.
While this enlargement allowed Hezbollah to play a bigger regional role, from Syria to Iraq and even reportedly in Yemen, it came with a heavy cost. Many of the group’s newer fighters, especially those in regular or reserve units, were less ideological, or enlisted just to get certain benefits. Others just didn’t take operation security seriously.
As a result of these factors and others, like the proliferation of digital communications, Israeli intelligence had an unprecedented chance to penetrate deep into Hezbollah.
While Israeli intelligence was watching Hezbollah closer than ever, the IDF was developing its air defenses, especially missile interceptors, like never before.
The last war came to expose everything wrong with Hezbollah’s post-2006 doctrine. The group had no real operational security with nearly all of its original leadership, including Nasrallah, getting assassinated, its regular-styled units failed to stop the IDF in southern Lebanon and most importantly, its costly missile and drone arsenal didn’t perform so well in the face of Israeli air defenses.
Considering these results, it is completely logical of Hezbollah to consider returning to the pre-2006 doctrine. In fact, this is the right thing to do.
With the fall of the Assad regime, all of Hezbollah supply lines, which pass through Syria, were served. Thus, rebuilding, or just maintaining, the group’s existent missile and drone arsenal will be more costly and difficult.
Downsizing and returning to asymmetric warfare will be more effective and affordable for Hezbollah. It will also improve the group’s operation security. In addition, Israel will have less excuses to justify its actions against Lebanon.
To narrow the technological and firepower gap with the IDF, Hezbollah could adopt new flexible weapon systems, like FPV suicide droenes. Such systems are easier to obtain, maintain and hide. At the same time, they can be more damaging than more complex military systems.
Hezbollah appears to be heading in the right direction, although the process will be difficult and could tarnish the image of the group among its supporters.
The group’s new leadership under the command of Qassem has so far proven to be capable of taking more flexible decisions. Considering the fact that the conflict with Israel is not yet over, this is exactly the type of leadership the group needs to survive and strike back.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence
NOW hosted at southfront.press
Previously, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.org.
The .org domain name had been blocked by the US (NATO) (https://southfront.press/southfront-org-blocked-by-u-s-controlled-global-internet-supervisor/) globally, outlawed and without any explanation
Back before that, from 2013 to 2015, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.com
hezbollah is integrating into the lebanese state
but syria will slaughter them as soon as they lay down their weapons.
hezbollah caused significative damage to idf, many surveillance systems such radar, camera, comunication, intel, elint..etc.. were destroyed by fpv drones and atgm, moreover idf failed to advance in lebanon and many rokets fall in israel ( about 100.000 israeli population leave their village), censors of image was activate…
it was in de facto control of lebanon pre-war in terms of its prowess, reputation, leverage & influence over governance of lebanese politics. now that the top leaders are gone, those most driven & capable entrusted with the skillful craft of political maneuvering and diplomacy, the personal connections & relationships with officials and others, the networks of contacts & partners cultivated by years of adversity, hard work, experience, charisma & competency is now gone to !
stopped reading when you wrote that hezbollah is a “terror group”. it’s sad that you have zionists writing worthless slop articles on southfront now.
you have reading comprehension problem? article is objective and actually paints an accurate picture of hezbollah – which happens to be a positive one. no zionist bias whatsoever.
λαθος κανετε !! το αρθρο υπουλα και πονηρα υπονομευει την χεζμπολαχ !!!
artsakh was a test case, russian leadership failed miserably to protect its interests in order to ingratiate itself with treacherous pro-zionist azerbaijan and ancient enemy turkey. the ukraine war might have been prevented, the overthrow of syria prevented. the fact that you very often can’t tell the difference between “pro-russian” media and “western” media, to me, is proof that the russian state is not a serious adversary of russia’s enemies.
what has happened to southfront. they were suddenly anti-assad, now they publish reuters.
but israel doesn’t honor agreements and us assurances are worthless. not that the author doesn’t have a point, but still…
anybody else think that beirut explosion was a small nuke?
if it had been a small atomic bomb, everything there would be contaminated by now. but it isn’t. it was tons of ammonium nitrate, a component of explosives. the stuff caught fire and exploded.
the lion of judah is dismembering hezbollah…heheheeh
bla bla’s goat floats over la la’s lake. and the moon is brighter at night than it is outside.
you know nothing about the lion of judah. these satanists living there are not his, start by repenting because you will face the wrath of the lion of judah when he comes.
why all russias allies are useless clowns
its just a lie which source . hezbollah clearly told source from hezbollah its only the truth not any other . so this giving up arms is just a talk. infect hezbollah si preparing for next round at same time with iran and houthis to hit israel.
hezbollah will be even more powerful when they give up all weapons!
sad and stupid cope from south front!!!
why hezbollah believes the idf and hts will not attack hezbollah
the first priority is to clear out the 5,000 strong jewsa “embassy” spy centre.
big time!!! how dum are the lebanese
‘a lebanese with ties to the american administration’ . nasrallahs’ people scouting out the rats around them.
yes yes give your heavy weapons and then you ass to zionists. the only question is why hezbo did not partecipate in the zio-iran war, joining their forces with teheran they could hoverhelm zio defenses but instead they did nothing.
περιμενουν ! προς στιγμην ακυρωνουν τις προσπαθειεσ των αγγλο-σιωνιστων και ισραηλ για εμφυλιο στον λιβανο !!!
reuters? that’s the enemy.
is there still people trusting the west in negociation. if they do, at that point, its own fault
το αρθρο ειναι προπαγανδα κατα της χεζμπολαχ ! ο σιδερενιος θολος του ισραηλ εγινε σουρωτηρι απο την χεζμπολαχ !! το αρθρο ψευδεται !!!
we all know what u.s. ‘assurances’ are worth. arabs will never learn.
seriously wrong assessment. zionist/christian lebanese/u.s. forces are not going to copy hezbollah;s refusal to use its power when it had it, their aim is the complete elimination of hezbollah as a meaningful presence in lebanon. just as israel will force lebanon to cede territory to its syrian client. as an imperial power, israel seeks the erasure of all opposition to its suzerainty.
seriously wrong assessment. as is a matter of record, its regular-styled units did stop the idf, its costly missile and drone arsenal performed very well in the face of israeli air defenses – ask the settlers. hezbollah’s error -nasrullah’s error, iran’s error – was the lack of a decisive political aim plus a refusal to hit israel sufficiently to force a peace on arab terms.
never surrender to these liars, grave mistake, they will kill you all.