The FGM-148 Javelin surface-attack guided missile and launcher is a fire-and-forget, man-portable medium close combat missile system consisting of a command launch unit (CLU) and a round.
It is operated by an individual soldier or in crews of two or three. It is suitable for use during the day, the night, and even in limited visibility.
The Javelin’s primary role is to destroy enemy armored vehicles, up to 2 kilometers away.
When there is no armored vehicle threat, the Javelin can be employed in a secondary role of providing fire support against point targets such as bunkers and crew-served weapons positions.
In mechanized Infantry units, when Bradley fighting vehicles (BFVs) are part of a combined-arms team with tanks, the Javelin becomes a secondary weapon system.
The Command Launch Unit could be used as an aided vision device for reconnaissance, security operations, and surveillance.
The Javeling is employed based on METT-TC (mission, enemy, terrain, troops available, time, and civilian considerations). The gunner strives to engage enemy vehicles in the 1,000-to 2,000-meter range. The Javelin size and small-launch signature are not easily detected at these distances, and the maximum effective range of most machine guns is about 1,000 meters.
It is also used to provide mutual supporting fire for allied units.
In order to provide mutual support most successfully, the gunners are supposed to cover overlapping areas of fire.
Finally, in order to provide a better idea of how mutual support is provided, and the overlapping areas work, a positioning of the Javelin in depth on a battlefield.
It has the following capabilities:
- A maximum range of 2 km;
- The Javelin has a fire and forget capability. The missile I2R system gives the missile the ability to guide itself to the target when launched by the gunner;
- It has two missile flight paths: Top attack flight path is designed to impact on top of the target; Direct attack flight path is designed to impact on the side (front, rear, flank) of the target;
- The gunner is capable of firing up to 3 missiles per 2 minutes;
- It is capable of piercing any known type of armor;
- The Night Vision Sight (NVS) is quite effective, with very little degradation of the image;
- Any countermeasures used by the enemy are voided by the use of the NVS filter.
- It is man-portable;
- The fire-and-forget capability allows the gunner to shoot, and then move to safety;
- The soft launch capability allows it to be launched from buildings and bunkers;
- It is maneuverable over short distances for the gunners;
- Its passive infrared targeting system, used to acquire targets cannot be detected;
- The launch motor provides a very slight signature;
It, however, has the following limitations:
- The Command Launch Unit cannot discriminate targets past 2 km;
- The NVS cooldown time is from 2.5 to 3.5 minutes.
- The seeker’s cooldown time is about 10 seconds;
- The Battery Control Unit is 1-time-use and it has 4 minutes of life;
- The day FOV relies on daylight to provide the gunner a suitable target image;
- The NVS uses the IR naturally emitted from objects. IR crossover is the time at dawn and dusk that the terrain and the target are close enough in temperature to cause the target to blend in with its surroundings;
- Heavy fog reduces the capability of the gunner to detect and engage targets;
- The flight path of the missile is restricted in wooded, mountainous, and urban terrain;
- The gunner must have line of sight for the seeker to lock onto a target;
- The weight of the Javelin makes maneuvering slow over long distances;
- The Javelin round is bulky and restricts movement in heavily wooded or vegetative terrain;
- The gunner must partially expose himself to engage the enemy;
- The Command Launch Unit requires a clear line-of-sight to acquire targets in top attack and direct attack modes.
Below are the physical characteristics of the Command Launch Unit:
The physical characteristics of the round are the following:
The Javelin is primarily used by the the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, but it has also been sold to 18 partner nations, including Ukraine, France, Qatar, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
Given that the Javelin has been used primarily to hit soft targets and structures, a new version of the Javelin warhead with a deadlier blast fragmentation has been introduced, designated the FGM-148F. This new warhead is supposedly just as effective against tanks, and no costlier than its predecessors.
The Javelin missiles were very spoke of around the end of 2019, since they were a big part of US President Donald Trump’s impeachment hearings. In May 2018 Ukraine purchased 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launchers from the United States for an estimated $47 million. The missiles were the first lethal military assistance provided to Ukraine by the United States in its fight against the people of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics in eastern Ukraine, since the fighting began in 2014.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
Armata testing 1,2,3,4 …
Ha ha 1 is enough.
Doubt it. As far as I know, they haven’t killed any armor in Syria or anyplace else. Ukraine got them and haven’t seen a word regarding them in that theater. Probably like most of the rest of NATO gear: looks cool, does nothing.
If NATO stuff wasn’t working it wasn’t around the globe, mate
you cannot complain if your alliance/seller dont give you a damn choice, its eitheir our weapon or no weapon at all, thats how the usa deal
Americans are not philantropists. Of course its something for something.
We see the opposite for the communisme collapse and the insisting ME ones.
Here it seemes forgotten, that most weapons are outsourced and many countries actually contribute with vital as well as no vital parts of them.
Thats includes all kinds of supply and all kinds of equipment down to food rations.
So if you don’t buy weapons that don’t work we attack you with weapons that don’t work
Marketing and political pressure.
Yeah, all peace and flowers
That too. According Javelins, You are old days too.
The Javelin of today and tomorrow acrually is produced in Kongsberg, Norway and standard for the Strykers since 2020.
pfffft.
There are no Strykers as well ???
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stryker#Armament
You have not even been reading the article right above You by SF :) :)
Javelins has been famous since they kiled heavy armed Russian tanks in Afghanistan 25 years ago.
And John? Look cool, does nothing and stay stupid.
Entered service in 1996, years ago. To what are you not paying attention? There was no Afghanistan war then turkey. Nice try.
Its much easier to fight enemies like You insisting stupid no learners.
Soviets lefts Afghanistan 1989, 31 years ago. Did they leave tanks behind for the Afghans militants to practice target shooting? And who was operating those Russian tanks then?
Some John 3 comments wrote: “they haven’t killed any armor in Syria or anyplace else”.
just as if he dont know, things dont exist.
Americans and their contractors then must be very stupid to produce 20.000/50.000 and next the buyers of them must be even more stupid also because those missiles are vey (too) expensive.
Apart from that, I am sure the Russians left many tanks in Afghanistan such as T85 and the mre famous T72.
My point here is Assads do use those old armored vehicles and those just as the Javelins produced today of coirse are upgraded – And therefor e the Javeling can hit even the Armata hard even it might not be a fist time killer.
I wrote that too. If You hit the tower, the backend or the catewrpillar even an Armata wont like that.
And its the same knd of disputes for people here writing the Armata is the best tank in the world. Several agree in that. A totally upgraded Leopard (because Armata is very strong) seemes better in data.
Several other tanks seemes to be on the same high level as the Armata.
Furthermore the ARMATA will arrive for TESTING for the real world in Syria. How can people here write the Armata is the best in fx the Syrian warfare terrain and cloomate, if not a single one has arrived yet and never has been in war?
Thats what my comments are about:
A modern Javelin monted on Stryker from 2020 from Kongsberg Normay isnt a Javelin in the Afghanistan version.
An Armata might be the best. Anybosy can make the best tank in the world but also has to pay a lot for that kind of prestige. Normal warfare mainly is best for the price.
The Russians just as others has such kind of ultimative “doomesdays”, but are they produced. Np, they are nopt. The Russians hardly can finace 20 of them themselves. Which customers can and will.
The picture for several missiles of theirs is much better. They have high or relative high standards as well as a low price. By that they get a lot of money back to finace their own. That make sense.
Jens, nice work. I really appreciate your comments, although I may not agree with all of them.
In a Disney movie…
We dont no id any Armata is tested safe for Javelins at all.
If You have connections high above, You should give a link …
They can’t knock out the T-90s in Syria, so what make you think they are going to take out T-14s, which were tested in Syria, during the war. Wouldn’t that have been a PR score, if it could have been done.
Yes Javelins can. They have to hit the top or the behind as well as catterpillar can be cut.
A bit of a side track here, but Iran looks to have copied the infamous spike missile down to the tiniest part, according to the J-post and ANM news:
https://mobile.almasdarnews.com/article/iran-may-have-replicated-israeli-missile-shot-down-in-syria-video/
Overrated like most U.S. made weapon systems.
Doesnt work in a forrest..
Targeting system needs criogenic cooling.
Kornet and advanced RPGs are a lot more effective.
I dont think thats the point. Second best in most tests say they are very good ones against heavy armor.
And if they are second, there are number 3, 4, 5, 6 a.s.o.
I just allow me to assume that if an Aramata is not even tested against a Javelin, its very difficult to see, that an Armata is number one -. And not even a single Armata has ever been there:)
And it costs a fortune. I prefer the Houthi-in-Sandals-with-bic-lighter. Now THAT’s a weapons system
But is it as good as the battle proven Kornet?
An ATGM that has claims to all known Israeli, German and U.S. MBT’s in it’s roll of honors.
A highly effective Russkie-Tank destroying weapon! Destroyed at least 4 t72 tanks at Conoco during the Battle of Kusham! Also the Ukrainian Army have loads of these recently delivered under the awesome POTUS arms deal with Zelensky.
Sorry! I didn’t know your t90 t80 or t-whatever were invulnerable!
writes the idiot from durakistan
obviously of limited value—-the Ukrop Nazis, trained by amerikan/Canadian Nazis have had zero success in defeating the heroic Novorussia brigades, nor have they been able to seize any territory in the now effectively independent Donbass
with the introduction of inexpensive surveillance drones and the use of advanced sniper rifles with a similar range, these expensive poorly mobile weapons r easily neutralized in actual battle conditions
dident the modern javelin have a range of 4800m?