Did Pompeo Dupe Trump Into the Soleimani Hit?

Did Pompeo Dupe Trump Into the Soleimani Hit?

Written by Mike Whitney; Originally appeared at The Unz Review

Donald Trump is under the illusion that the fracas with Iran is over. He thinks that Iran’s pinprick missile strikes on US bases in Iraq have assuaged Tehran’s thirst for revenge. But he’s wrong. The missile strikes were merely the first salvo in an epic cage match between Iran’s Axis of Resistance and its 70 year-long nemesis, the United States. As Iran’s Supreme Leader said on Wednesday, the missile attacks were not sufficient payback for the assassination of Iran’s most decorated military hero, Qassem Soleimani. They were just “a slap”, just Round One in what will surely be a long and bloody campaign aimed at driving the US out of the Middle East.

I wonder if Trump has any idea of what he’s done? It’s one thing to hector, threaten, coerce and sanction a rival nation, especially a nation that sits on an ocean of oil in a strategically-located area like the Middle East. But it’s another thing to assassinate the country’s highest-ranking and most revered military commander, an Iranian Rommel, whose tireless devotion to service spans a 40 year-long period. That’s not something that can be shrugged off or swept under the rug. That’s an act of war that requires a muscular response from the state. No country can allow its military leaders to be killed with impunity. Iran will have to fight back, and they will fight back. The question is “how”?

Iran will likely intensify the strategy that Soleimani perfected; hybrid, 4th Generation unconventional warfare conducted via Iran’s proxies in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan and Lebanon. They will forgo using their bulging arsenal of long-range ballistic missiles and, instead, implement an asymmetrical strategy aimed at roiling markets, blocking shipping lanes, demolishing petrochemical plants and wasting oil tankers. The objective will be to wreak havoc across the region making the US presence less and less tenable while invoking plausible deniability as to the perpetrator. It will be a war that is largely conducted in the shadows. The Middle East is a target-rich environment for those who have the proxies, the weapons and the inclination to create mayhem. This is a war that Iran is prepared to fight and this is a war that Iran can win.

Iran also has more extreme options as illustrated in this excerpt from an article at DW:

“The IRGC can threaten shipping lanes in the Gulf, Gulf of Oman and the Caspian Sea through the application of a wide variety of assets it has at its disposal, including submarines, smart torpedoes, smart mine capability, and land-based, long-range anti-ship missiles strategically based on the mainland, islands, and ships”…Such attacks could put a halt to the world’s oil transport network, at least for a time. One-fifth of global oil production is shipped through the strait between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula. If the Strait of Hormuz were to become unsafe for ship passage, it would not only affect the United States but also a large number of countries around the world. The US would be under great pressure to end any war with Iran as quickly as possible….” (“Iran-US conflict: Tehran’s asymmetrical approach”, dw.com)

Did Trump mull-over any of these grim scenarios before he ordered the assassination of Soleimani? Was he told that both Obama and G.W. Bush opted not to kill Soleimani because they knew the backlash would be too great? Did Trump even know that Soleimani helped the US defeat ISIS and al Qaida in Iraq and Syria?

How much did Trump actually know about Soleimani or was he intentionally kept in the dark by his fanatical neocon advisors like Mike Pompeo? That doesn’t excuse Trump or make him any less culpable for his decision, but it does suggest that his sources of information might be tainted by conflicting political agendas. A recent article in the New York Times titled “Pompeo Upended Middle East by Pushing Trump to Kill Iranian General” appears to support this theory. Here’s an excerpt:

“Last week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was the loudest voice in the administration pushing President Trump to kill Iran’s most important general….The strike against the Iranian general has affirmed Mr. Pompeo’s position as the second-most powerful official in the Trump administration…… as the man at the center of the argument to launch the drone strike that killed Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani — and who pushed Mr. Trump to withdraw from the landmark Iran nuclear deal in 2018 — he is in the unusual role of shaping national security policy…

Mr. Pompeo, 56, could become known as the man who helped lead the United States into another conflict in the Middle East — breaking one of Mr. Trump’s key campaign promises just as the president faces re-election..

Mr. Pompeo said he and other American officials “evaluated the relevant risks” that the strike against General Suleimani might bring. He cited “continuing efforts on behalf of this terrorist to build out a network of campaign activities that were going to lead potentially to the death of many more Americans.”…(“Pompeo Upended Middle East by Pushing Trump to Kill Iranian General”, New York Times)

This simply isn’t true. Soleimani did not organize any “campaign activities” to kill American soldiers. That’s baloney. He was in Baghdad working on a peace agreement with his Saudi counterpart when he was incinerated by a missile launched from an American drone. Pompeo has produced no hard evidence to back this spurious claim.

Nor is there any proof that there was an “imminent threat”. That’s another one of Pompeo’s howlers. The only threat that materialized was the threat that an Iranian General on a peace mission would be senselessly obliterated by a bloodthirsty cabal in Washington. Here’s more from the Times:

“…no major attack against the sprawling and heavily-fortified diplomatic compound in Baghdad’s Green Zone is “imminent,” even though Mr. Pompeo has asserted that repeatedly, said the official, who discussed administration deliberations only on the condition of anonymity. Some Pentagon officials had said earlier that there was no intelligence revealing any unusual threats.

On Tuesday, Mr. Pompeo did not repeat his assertions that the United States had intelligence about an “imminent” attack and instead pointed to recent violent episodes.

“If you’re looking for imminence, you need look no further than the days that led up to the strike that was taken against Suleimani,” Mr. Pompeo said, apparently referring to the rocket attack by an Iranian-backed militia that killed an American interpreter, Nawres Hamid, in Iraq on Dec. 27.” (New York Times)

So rather than admit that he was lying, the cagey Pompeo simply diverts attention to the American contractor who was killed last week. That’s called bait-and-switch, a tactic that’s typically used by hucksters and charlatans. The fact is, there was no indication that an attack was imminent. None. Soleimani posed no threat to US troops or US assets at all. He was killed for nothing or, rather, he was killed because Trump and Pompeo wanted him dead. That’s the bottom line. Here’s more from the same article:

“Pompeo… is a chief architect of the rising tensions between the United States and Iran. As Mr. Trump’s first C.I.A. director, he created a special center to deal with Iran…Days after becoming secretary of state in 2018, Mr. Pompeo pushed Mr. Trump to withdraw from the nuclear agreement and reimpose strict sanctions on Iran. He has nurtured closer partnerships with Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, enemies of Iran that sometimes have agendas that run counter to American interests….

In April, he advised Mr. Trump to designate as a foreign terrorist organization the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, an arm of the Iranian military that includes General Suleimani’s elite Quds Force. It was the first time the United States had applied that label to a part of another government.

And after the Dec. 31 breach of the American Embassy in Baghdad, Mr. Pompeo pushed harder for the strike against Mr. Suleimani, which Defense Department officials had presented to Mr. Trump as an extreme and not particularly palatable option only days earlier….

Last year, on a trip to Israel, Mr. Pompeo invoked the Bible in saying Mr. Trump was a modern-day Queen Esther sent by God to save the Jews from Iran.” (New York Times)

Let’s summarize:

  1. Pompeo was the biggest and most outspoken supporter of assassination.
  2. It was Pompeo “who pushed Mr. Trump to withdraw from the landmark Iran nuclear deal.”…
  3. It was also Pompeo who convinced Trump that the benefits of killing Solemani outweighed the risks
  4. It was also Pompeo who justified the assassination by stating that there was a “imminent threat” against US assets, a claim for which there is no evidence.
  5. It was also Pompeo who persuaded Trump to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organization.”
  6. Pompeo is the “chief architect” of the administration’s failed Iran policy which includes the ongoing economic strangulation and the abandoning of Washington’s obligations under the terms of the nuclear agreement.
  7. And, it will also be Pompeo who– like his ideological twin, George W Bush–will be “known as the man who helped lead the United States into another conflict in the Middle East.”

Again, none of this justifies Trump’s monstrous decision to kill Soleimani, but it does show how Pompeo’s ingratiating “apple-polishing” behavior has helped him to advance his own political agenda, an agenda that appears to be far more tilted in Tel Aviv’s favor than Washington’s. How does that fit with Trump’s “America First” doctrine?

It doesn’t fit at all, in fact, it strongly suggests that Pompeo’s loyalties lie elsewhere. Why else would he put the US on a path to a military confrontation with Iran, a confrontation that will undoubtedly have catastrophic implications for the United States? How does that benefit America?

And what would the outcome of such a hellish, region-wide conflagration be? Here’s how “Grand Chessboard” geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski summed it up more than a decade ago:

“An attack on Iran would be an act of political folly, setting in motion a progressive upheaval in world affairs. With the U.S. increasingly the object of widespread hostility, the era of American preponderance could even come to a premature end. Although the United States is clearly dominant in the world at the moment, it has neither the power nor the domestic inclination to impose and then to sustain its will in the face of protracted and costly resistance.”

This is the nightmare scenario, the end of America brought to you by the two biggest dunderheads to ever to serve in public office: Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo.

Is there any way to stop this train-wreck?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FlorianGeyer

In a previous post I iterated that Trump was likely played for a fool by Pompous Pompeo into authorising the murder of General Soleimani who was acting as a Diplomatic Envoy at the time.

I have stated before that Trumps knowledge of foreign affairs is limited to his affairs with Eastern European women, in my opinion.

Zionism = EVIL

Trump is a loudmouth buffoon for the Zionist scum and their shills like the fat pig Pompeo. The Americunts only understand the logic of force and Iran needs to re-calibrate its approach after the past weeks mayhem and disasters.

FlorianGeyer

I am sure they will. That is the intelligent route to take by Iran in a continually changing world.

Unlike the US that has not learned anything from all their strategic defeats.
Unless of course the US strategy is to murder and maim billions of people in the name of US Democratic Values. + dirt cheap oil and resources of course.

Zionism = EVIL

The FACT is that the Iranians are dealing with the worst murdering degenerate Americunt thug government in history and the naive mullahs are trying to play softly by Marquis of Queens-bury rules by trying not to inflict casualties on the Americunt aggressors who turned the region literally upside down, killed millions and are looting the whole natural resources base. If Iran had reacted early to the repeated Americunt and Zionist provocations and air attacks, general Soleimani would still be alive and the Ukrainian plane would not have been shot down. The Americunts only understand the logic of force as the Taliban and Afghan resistance have amply demonstrated. With Iran sending mixed signals and a passive approach things will only get worse. The Iranian population was genuinely angry after the cold blooded murder of a decent soldier diplomat Soleimani but the mullahs squandered all the grief by sending the Americunts warnings before hitting empty buildiings and the result is now more bullying and warmongering against Iran. Either resist or be ready to capitulate. Only a sustained regional resistance will get rid of the Americunt occupation as they are so arrogant now that they flatly rejected official Iraqi demands to withdraw and Trump is boasting they are getting billions from Iraqi, Syrian and Saudi oil.

Assad must stay

I know, seriously, I was expecting a lot smarter strategy from iran, why are their mullahs so dopey in this regard?

Zionism = EVIL

Well you are not the only one brother. I was fuming but people here get upset if you tell them the TRUTH. Iranians have been dying in Syria and Iraq for 7 years now and they have not killed a single Zionist scum or Americunt occupation thug. This will only invite more blatant thuggery. The Americunts want to cut a deal in Afghanistan because 2-3 body bags are coming home daily now.

Assad must stay

But what gives? Are they just scared it will start a big war? Or is it something else?

Zionism = EVIL

As I said to the chagrin of many mullah supporters, the mullahs only want to stay in power, they don’t give a shit. But now the IRGC has been humiliated and today people in anger burnt the photos of General Soleimani. They have to and must act or Iran will be attacked in force.Iranians were so angry after the assassination that they would have paid any price to get even with the Americunts, but the old mullah Khamenei chickened out and fired dud missiles. Why do you think they got rid of Ahmedinejad an educated PhD Engineer, who knew how the world works.

Assad must stay

Agreed, do you think khamenei will resign after all this?

Zionism = EVIL

He is 83 years old with prostate cancer, but these mullahs don’t die for some reason, look at Sistani, he is close to 100 and still kissing Americunt arse. If this idiot Khamenei had any self-respect he should have committed hara kiri, but they will sacrifice some junior general like Hajizadeh to calm the public down. But there is too much anger. Iranians are proud ancient people and don’t want to be humiliated. They sacrificed a million kids to fight Saddam and will do so again if properly led.All these bastards Khemenei, the pot bellied coward Rouhani and the arse kisser Zarif must go or should be tried.

Assad must stay

Noooo I love hajizadeh

good american

They probably want to limit the death and destruction that would happen. The US concept of ‘winning’ is not the same as most people think of it- complete annihilation of a country’s forward progress is good enough. No more rising star, no more threat to Israel, and lots and lots of money to the MIC.. That is why they always say ‘bring you back to the stone age’. They don’t care about winning in the classic sense of the word. It is understandable that they don’t want to look like Iraq, a palace turned into ghetto house overnight.
I imagine the Iranians understand that revenge is a dish best served cold. Death by a thousand cuts and all that. It may take longer, but may be safer.

Assad must stay

havent they already been doing that for who knows how many years?

good american

And I imagine they have more to go. They lost a knight but haven’t lost the game. They are maligned, shackled, starved and beaten, yet they persevere. Like Putin’s Russia, the Houthis, and everyone that resists the Evil Empire, they are to be admired. I think they are playing the game well.

Assad must stay

hopefully this makes trump fire pompeos fat disgusting ass, of course the next question is will the replacement be better or worse? If he’s worse then he will definitely lose the election

Zionism = EVIL

The only way the pimp Trump will lose is an Americunt military quagmire in the region with daily casualties. It will require sacrifices by Iran and its allies but they can win if they act.

good american

The only time Pompeo’s fat face will look good is when it is resting on the chopping block.

Assad must stay

haahhahaha agreed

Lazy Gamer

The way to understand Trump is to know that he is a businessman experienced with making deals. He will bully you into making concessions if he thinks he has the upper hand. All his intl. negotiations show this. Frank and blunt. However, there are a few exceptions where some irrationality from the other party is involved. It seems then that there is a lack of long term strategy but rather a reliance on military and economic might to bring anyone to heel. Now this predisposition can always be easily influenced by someone cunning.

Albert Pike

Even if Pompeo duped Trump into doing something, which fits Pompeo’s end of days christian Zionist agenda, it was Trump who made him first head of the CIA and then State Department boss, he knew what he was doing, but he did it anyway. So no excuse for Trump…

Xoli Xoli

Time to put fat fuck ass bafoon Pompeo and Boris the gay in a container rape each other until one dies.

Liberal guy

Trump is modern day queen Esther and pompeo her uncle

Dušan Mirić

It is not hard to push a frog in water (Croatian proverb).
As Tulsi Gabbard said in one of her videos, Trump was choosing men like Bolton and Pompeo so there’s no excuse.