Defend journalist Julian Assange from extradition to the United States

Defend journalist Julian Assange from extradition to the United States

This is an undated handout photo issued by Sunshine Press made available Tuesday May 10, 2016, of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange with a kitten in Ecuador’s embassy in London. (Sunshine Press/Wikileaks via AP)

Written by Dr. Leon Tressell exclusively for SouthFront

On Wednesday Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange appeared at a Westminster court for his final case management hearing before his extradition hearing which begins on 24 February.

The U.S. government will present its case arguing for Assange’s extradition to face 17 charges under the Espionage Act and one charge of computer crime which could carry a sentence, if convicted, of 175 years.

At the extradition hearing Assange’s London lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, will argue that the United States ‘breached due process’ due its surveillance operation of the Wikileaks editor while sheltering in the Ecuadorian embassy. This secret surveillance operation was carried out by a Spanish company that sent the footage to U.S. intelligence services,. It filmed Assange talking to his lawyers, family and friends in the embassy and is the subject of an investigation in Spain.

Joseph Farrell, a spokesman for Wikileaks, stated that this breach of due process raises huge doubts as to whether Julian Assange will receive a fair trial next week:

“You had a security company working for the Ecuadorian Embassy that was recording all of his meetings, including his meetings with his doctors and his lawyers, including strategic legal discussions, so that completely destroys any element of client/attorney privilege.”

International support from Julian Assange mounts

Assange’s case has received support from 2 Australian MPs who visited the Wikileaks publisher at Belmarsh maximum security prison on Tuesday. They called on the UK government to block his extradition to the U.S.

Australian MP Andrew Wilke said on twitter:

“In London we met with UN Special Rapporteur on Torture to discuss Julian Assange. Nils left us in no doubt that Assange is showing the effects of psychophysical torture and feels betrayed by the justice system in the UK, the USA&Aus.”

Further pressure is being brought to bear by the publication on 17 February of a letter in the Lancet representing 117 doctors from 18 countries.

They note that their first 2 letters to the UK government on the treatment of Assange had been ignored. The letter declares:

“We condemn the torture of Assange. We condemn the denial of his fundamental right to appropriate health care. We condemn the climate of fear surrounding the provision of health care to him. We condemn the violations of his right to doctor–patient confidentiality. Politics cannot be allowed to interfere with the right to health and the practice of medicine.”

The 117 doctors conclude their letter with a warning to the UK government and a call for solidarity and support for Julian Assange:

“Should Assange die in a UK prison, as the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has warned, he will effectively have been tortured to death. Much of that torture will have taken place in a prison medical ward, on doctors’ watch. The medical profession cannot afford to stand silently by, on the wrong side of torture and the wrong side of history, while such a travesty unfolds.

In the interests of defending medical ethics, medical authority, and the human right to health, and taking a stand against torture, together we can challenge and raise awareness of the abuses detailed in our letters. Our appeals are simple: we are calling upon governments to end the torture of Assange and ensure his access to the best available health care before it is too late. Our request to others is this: please join us.”

EU Human Rights Commissioner declares Assange should not be extradited

Further pressure has been brought to bear on the UK government on Thursday by the unprecedented intervention of Dunja Mijatović, who is the Council of Europe’s Human Rights Commissioner. She released a statement opposing Assange’s extradition to the United States due to the, “potential impact on press freedom and concerns about ill-treatment.”

The Human Rights Commissioner declared that:

“Julian Assange’s potential extradition has human rights implications that reach far beyond his individual case. The indictment raises important questions about the protection of those that publish classified information in the public interest, including those that expose human rights violations. The broad and vague nature of the allegations against Julian Assange, and of the offences listed in the indictment, are troubling as many of them concern activities at the core of investigative journalism in Europe and beyond. Consequently, allowing Julian Assange’s extradition on this basis would have a chilling effect on media freedom, and could ultimately hamper the press in performing its task as purveyor of information and public watchdog in democratic societies.”

She went on to acknowledge the danger that Assange may suffer torture at the hands of U.S. authorities:

“Furthermore, any extradition to a situation in which the person involved would be at real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment would be contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment has made clear that he considers that both the detention conditions in the United States and the sentence likely to be imposed on Julian Assange present such a real risk.

She concludes with the damning conclusion, remember this is coming from the EU a close American ally, that Assange should not be extradited to the United States:

“In view of both the press freedom implications and the serious concerns over the treatment Julian Assange would be subjected to in the United States, my assessment as Commissioner for Human Rights is that he should not be extradited.”

UK Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell visits Julian Assange and calls for his release

On a day of dramatic interventions the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell visited Julian Assange at Belmarsh maximum security prison. He has battled for several weeks to be allowed to visit the Wikileaks publisher. McDonnell has recently spoken at public rallies calling for Assange’s release.

After visiting Julian Assange the Shadow Chancellor said:

“We are hoping that in court he is able to defeat the extradition bid. We don’t believe that extradition should be used for political purposes, and all the evidence – even the recent revelations with regard to Trump engagement – demonstrates that this is a political trial and we are hoping that the courts will see it that way.”

“If this extradition takes place it will damage the democratic standing of our own country as well as America. We have a long standing tradition in this country of standing up for whistle blowers, journalists … if this extradition takes place I think it will damage our reputation.”

Despite the obstacles facing the Wikileaks editor John McDonnell remained optimistic that Assange’s extradition may not go ahead:

“I am hoping that combination of cross-party support, what has happened in the media, the exposes that have taken place in recent weeks, will ensure that we have a climate of opinion in this country that prevents this extradition taking place.”

The UK historian/journalist Mark Curtis, who has been a consistent critic of US and UK foreign policy in the Middle East, has noted the conspiracy of silence by the UK media over the British government’s ‘criminal’ handling of Assange’s case:

“It’s a big deal when a UN special rapporteur [Professor Nils Melzer] says UK officials should be investigated for possible “criminal conduct” over torture of Julian Assange. Proof of its importance that it hasn’t been mentioned in any UK mainstream media report, as far as I can see.”

The 2003 extradition treaty between the UK and US forbids extradition on the grounds of political offences. Yet this award winning journalist is being extradited, for exposing American war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan and government corruption around the world.

Take solidarity action to stop the extradition of Julian Assange.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
King Cliff

He’s a journalist he shouldn’t face trial for leaking the truth and journalism I know to go heaven and hell to get a story…

goingbrokes

All journalists are soon to be Julian Assanges, to be extradited to the US from other countries if they publish material that is not to the liking of the US elites. I warned you, you may be next!

FlorianGeyer

History again repeats itself with the act of the powerful ‘Shooting the Messenger’.

Julian Assange is of course the Messenger who exposed the tyranny and violent crimes of the self anointed world controller today, the USA.

This badge of dishonor is currently held by the USA with assistance from the US vassal regimes of Sweden and the UK.

ZP

And where the hell is Australian Government? too busy trying to re-patriate drug traffickers from Indonesian jails. The 5 eyes seem to have been firmly shut

FlorianGeyer

‘There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see’.

5 Eyes are a perfect example of such selective myopia.

Lazy Gamer

What’s missing here are suits in the icc and icj. Let them admit first that these are truly classified information. As well as Assange’s home country raising the issues of breaches in intl. obligations and human rights(spying) by Ecuador, UK, and the US.
Next, most of the charges deal with Assange’s state of mind but as a journalist his only overriding concern is the publication and dissemination of the truth. Anything claimed more than that borders into speculation. Any correspondence of Assange intercepted should be inadmissible. Last, Assange has no personal knowledge as to the representations of Manning. He could have been led to believe it was a leak but in reality he was just unlocking a private code.

verner

it will turn out the way it turned out for milosevic – when the evidence against milosevic was insufficient to bring a guiltu verdict he was murdered -you know the heart-attack in the midst of a highly equipped prison in holland. do you for one second think that had they not administered the attack he would have been saved by the quickly arriving medics. but no – to save the white house morons loss of face.

Lazy Gamer

It is a question of sovereignty and interests for other nations here. The evidence is given but nobody is bringing a suit so they’re the ones also losing face. He may be murdered in jail but that will be for the UK’s human rights track record. Assange’s team should devise security plans for epstein scenarios. lol

frankly

All the fireworks about Russia-gate and the FBI does not investigate the assassination of Seth Rich. My take, like MLK, why investigate when you know exactly what happened. Just another coverup. What does Seth have to do with Julian? /the-fbi-has-been-lying-about-seth-rich/

https://consortiumnews.com/2020/01/29/the-fbi-has-been-lying-about-seth-rich/

When they killed Seth the message to all would be whistle blowing leakers, are you ready to die as a patriot? You like the red white and blue, so fuck you, boom. So you believe in justice, boom. A Bernie Sanders fan, boom.

It’s beautifully clear. WikiLeaks has never been proven wrong in any of their revelations. It’s the closest thing to an accurate source of information we have. Certainly in a Fascist regime Julian Assange must die.

So for all of his fake news disclosures Trump will go down for killing the only one proven not fake. If that is not ironic what is?

Ivan Freely

Well Dr. Tressell, Assange is already a dead man. His biggest mistake was believing that free speech exists in Western nations and not having an exit plan like Edward Snowden did. Yes, protest as much but don’t expect anything meaningful to come of it.