Oleksandr Syrskyi, Bohdan Krotevych
Former Azov Brigade commander accuses General Syrskyi of deadly tactics, highlighting internal military strife. Despite Western aid, Ukraine faces resource strains and far-right controversies, risking a prolonged conflict that could become the Europe’s “Vietnam” in the West’s proxy war against Moscow.
Written by Uriel Araujo, PhD, anthropology researcher with a focus on international and ethnic conflicts
Bohdan Krotevych, a notorious former Ukrainian commander and ex-chief of staff of the far-right Azov Brigade, has publicly called for the removal of General Oleksandr Syrskyi, Ukraine’s armed forces commander, accusing him of endangering soldiers’ lives with “borderline criminal” orders and outdated tactics, the Guardian reports.
Krotevych, who resigned in February (allegedly to speak freely), criticized Syrskyi for micromanaging the military and issuing directives that force troops to rest dangerously close to the front lines, such as 50 meters away, rather than in safer rear areas. He argues that Syrskyi’s lack of strategic innovation—relying on throwing more troops into battles or withdrawing them only when overwhelmed—has contributed to Ukraine’s losses in 2024 and 2025, including advances by Russian forces in Donbas and Kursk.
Although Krotevych is known to have in the past also reported General Yuri Sodol to the State Bureau of Investigation for “incompetent command”, the Guardian article highlights in fact a quite rare public and rather scandalous dissent from within Ukraine’s military ranks, shifting some blame for recent battlefield setbacks from external factors—like Russia’s numerical superiority—to internal leadership failures. Krotevych’s outspokenness underscores broader frustrations with Syrskyi, who has been criticized for his tactics since taking command in February 2024, despite earlier successes like the Kharkiv counteroffensive.
General Syrskyi is a four-star general and the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces since February 8, 2024. He has played key roles in the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian conflict, commanding the Kharkiv counteroffensive in 2022 as well as the Bakhmut one in 2023. Known for his strategic acumen, he has been both praised in Ukraine for battlefield successes and criticized for high-casualty tactics, earning nicknames like “General 200.”
Bohdan Krotevych, the whistleblower, in turn is a infamous figure in Ukraine’s military landscape, recognized for his role as a former commander and chief of staff of the Azov Brigade, a unit within the National Guard of Ukraine. Krotevych joined Azov in 2014 following Crimea’s status referendum and annexation to Russia.
The Azov Brigade itself, originally formed as a volunteer battalion in 2014, has been widely controversial due to its ties to far-right and neo-Nazi elements. Founded by neo-Nazi Andriy Biletsky, a figure with a documented history in ultra-nationalist and white supremacist circles, the unit has attracted individuals with extremist views from the very start.
Western media and analysts, including pre-2022 reports from CNN, Time etc, have noted and reported Azov’s neo-Nazi affiliations, though its integration into Ukraine’s National Guard and its role in fighting Russia have apparently shifted its public image (in the West at least) toward that of just a disciplined military force. Although the frequent appearance of Nazi swastikas and other such symbols on the uniforms of Azov’s soldiers (sometimes caught on live TV) remains an embarrassment.
Krotevych’s own far-right connections have been scrutinized. Critics point to his recommendation of a memoir by Albert Kesselring, a Nazi war criminal, to Azov recruits. He also took part in the 2014 Maidan coup as a member of the Right Sector—a radical nationalist group with far-right ultra-nationalist roots.
When accused of having political ambitions, Krotevych has been explicitly distancing himself from any alignment with Ukraine’s ambassador to the UK, Valerii Zaluzhnyi. Four-star General Zaluzhnyi, by the way, is General Oleksandr Syrskyi’s predecessor, viewed as a possible future contender for the presidency of Ukraine.
Zaluzhnyi, too, has been under scrutiny for far-right connections. He was photographed in front of a portrait of Stepan Bandera, the controversial Ukrainian nationalist figure, in a post shared by Ukraine’s parliament on X in January 2023 to mark Bandera’s birthday. The image sparked significant controversy, particularly in Poland, due to Bandera’s historical ties to ultra-nationalist groups and Nazi collaboration during World War II, involving the ethnic cleansing of Poles and Jews, as documented by historians such as Timothy Snyder. This remains a major issue with Polish-Ukrainian relations, as I’ve written. All of that is business as usual in post-2014 Ukraine.
It is true Krotevych’s resignation and outspokenness could suggest personal bias or a settling of scores (or political goals). His claims however do make sense. They resonate with some soldiers and analysts who have long criticized General Syrskyi’s “Soviet-style” approach, earning him monikers like “the Butcher” among detractors for high casualty rates, notably during the battle of Bakhmut in 2023.
As a former Azov Brigade commander with frontline experience, Krotevych has firsthand knowledge of combat operations and leadership dynamics, which should lend some weight to his operational critiques. Moreover, his specific examples, like the proximity of rest zones to combat lines, are plausible given documented reports of Ukraine’s strained resources and Syrskyi’s emphasis on holding ground at all costs. It was seen in Bakhmut, where Ukraine suffered heavy losses before withdrawing.
Independent analyses, such as those from military observers in Western media, have similarly noted Syrskyi’s preference for grinding, manpower-intensive tactics over maneuver warfare, which aligns with Krotevych’s charge of strategic stagnation.
Far-right extremism and corruption aside, the fact is that, despite billions in aid, Ukraine’s armed forces grapple with deep-rooted issues, from resource strains to criticized leadership tactics. And Washington has, as I wrote, even in September 2024, largely shifted this burden to Europe, and European leaders barely seem willing to shoulder it.
At this rate, the West’s proxy war in Ukraine against Moscow risks becoming Europe’s “Vietnam”—a prolonged, costly quagmire.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
in my blow any nazi trailer park we like quagmire
“winners win and losers weep” nato’s strategists should also be given some credit for their kursk failure along with their mindless assaults on fortified russian positions. this is a deflection of the true blame which falls on nato leaders who should be arrested for the abuse of the ukie people in their proxy war to destroy russia .
never mind nato, this is the united states national security state at work.
this is what happens when one has too many cooks making the broth. the kiev junta had to water down their broth and have resorted to collecting vegetables found in the street. when commanders have to chain their recruits to their posts, the end isn’t far away. western shysters are already talking of ukrainian incompetence as the reason for their inevitable defeat, as if they had nada to do with it. the dead nato list gives that game away.
the graham cracker and kellogg krispies are the prime examples of leadership failure.
someone asked trump why he chose kellogg to begin with. he answered, “well, i like rice krispies as long as the rice isn’t from china or vietnam, or prob. india too, but mostly because of the nickname kellogg gave me… tony the tiger! what’s not to love?”
ukraine should be parted like berlin and boris and the clown should be parted too for not taking putin’s deal back in 2022.
bene è cominciato il tiro al piccione degli f 16. più forte ragazzi.
american covert operations groups funded creation of ukraines ultra-nationalist groups for decades . how did those snipers magically appear in midan square ?
kesselring was by no means a “nazi war criminal.”
others better qualified to judge him than the writer such as churchill and general mark clark thought very highly of him.
italian partisans were shot on his orders – but only after murdering german troops.
mark clark was an imbecile, churchill was a degenerate war criminal, and murdering italian partisans who are fighting facists on their own soil is a war crime. kesselring should have had his ass plugged and been pumped full of air until he exploded. then the remains hould have been fed to pigs and the shit burned. thanks for derping, shitcock.
after odessa 🧨moldova
after moldova 🧨varna, bulgaria
after varna, 🧨burgaz bulgaria
after burgaz (bulgaria, 🧨east germany
will be free.
germans did not pay money for german army
germans paid money for arab refugees since 30 years.
z for victory..
syryski very bad general,
zelensky must change it.
ukraina is european unions new vietnnam
war will be contunie 8 years.
germany will not send any patriot air defence systems to ukraina anymore.
only england or usa can send but without mineral deal trump will not send patriots.
if there is no defence more 4 years ukraina how will defend its airspace?
“the war will end with ukraine’s unconditional surrender to russia or, if nato intervenes, it will end with the absolute destruction of ukraine”
scott ritter